If you think you should skip the vaccine, my DMs are open. I will try to convince you to reconsider. No pressure. But let me try to answer your questions and give you the information you need from reputable sources. I’ll explain all the details. 💉

@jwildeboer Try to convince me then. I am not willing to partake in an experiment of a type of therapy that has never before been tried on humans, especially not at large scale, with a rushed trial cycle, and where scientists and medical doctors that are calling for caution are silenced.
I might have considered it if the death rates were 10% or more, but with 99+% of survival rate, I think the virus (known as government) has caused mass psychosis and idiocy rather than a respiratory disease.

@niclas you can take the AstraZeneca or Johnson&Johnson vaccine, which are both classic vector vaccines, not mRNA.

@jwildeboer Not where I live, Pfizer only.
But if nytimes.com/interactive/2020/h is describing "classic vector vaccines", then I am not taking any of those either.
All I read is that DNA is used instead of RNA to produce the spike proteins. Still a gene therapy.
My main concern is that the spike protein is not good for the body in general, for instance latching on to the capillary walls and introduce drag and slower blood flow.

@niclas @jwildeboer I thought with the mRNA vaccines the spike protein is transcribed exactly once? That seems safer than having a replicating virus having the body reproduce a hypothetically unbounded amount of protein.

@clacke Yes. And mRNA isn’t experimental technology. A solid 30+ years of research and application are on the books. The mRNA vaccines have full approval in the EU, not emergency use like in the US. @niclas

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Mastodon instance for people with Wildeboer as their last name